Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobyH58vz9noKmk5j-n=ZGttn_xL=k9OztLvYZRPYBCdsA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c
Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While going through numutils.c I found the following thing:
> --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c
> +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ pg_ltoa(int32 value, char *a)
>      * Avoid problems with the most negative integer not being representable
>      * as a positive integer.
>      */
> -   if (value == (-2147483647 - 1))
> +   if (value == PG_INT32_MIN)
>     {
>         memcpy(a, "-2147483648", 12);
>         return;
> Attached is a patch. The interesting part is that pg_lltoa is not
> missing the check on PG_INT64_MIN.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()?