Re: Fast DSM segments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Fast DSM segments
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobwYH84_y6CMU8uJykt-1sygWByzzPyvLbmU_z610DbwA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fast DSM segments  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Fast DSM segments  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:03 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> That all makes sense.  Now I'm wondering if I should use exactly that
> word in the GUC... dynamic_shared_memory_preallocate?

I tend to prefer verb-object rather than object-verb word ordering,
because that's how English normally works, but I realize this is not a
unanimous view.

It's a little strange because the fact of preallocating it makes it
not dynamic any more. I don't know what to do about that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: global barrier & atomics in signal handlers (Re: Atomicoperations within spinlocks)