Re: nested hstore patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: nested hstore patch
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobvAP2iB37VPVtwppgbh8x-v7hP7Wn+YGrqw4AjVz5ySw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: nested hstore patch  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: nested hstore patch  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:51:06AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think this was the consensus solution when this was last discussed,
>> and I support it.  There is similar space for a binary XML data type
>> if someone feels like implementing it.  I think the names that were
>> proposed previously were something like jsonb and xmlb.
>
> The natural name is OBJSON, meaning object JSON, because as PostgreSQL
> people, we have to double-use letters wherever possible.  ;-)

Personally, I think the patch author should just run ps auxww | md5 |
sed 's/^[^0-9]//' | cut -c1-8 and call the new data type by the
resulting name.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: nested hstore patch
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL