On 11/19/2013 10:51 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> I suggest we add another type, maybe jsobj, which has input and output
>> as standard
>> "JSON" but which is defined from the start to be equivalent of existing
>> object
>> and not "preservable source code" to such object.
> I think this was the consensus solution when this was last discussed,
> and I support it. There is similar space for a binary XML data type
> if someone feels like implementing it. I think the names that were
> proposed previously were something like jsonb and xmlb.
>
I think that's the consensus position on a strategy.
JSONB seems to be the current winner min the name stakes.
cheers
andrew
