Re: superuser() shortcuts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: superuser() shortcuts
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobsya7XLK0ag0RYCafenSkjrrw04N38Cf5SM7zf=0hK5w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: superuser() shortcuts  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: superuser() shortcuts  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I'm not really particular about which way we go with the specific
>> wording (suggestions welcome..) but the inconsistency should be dealt
>> with.
>
> Meh.

+1 for "meh".  I don't mind making things consistent if it can be done
while maintaining or improving the absolute quality of those error
messages -- but if the changes involve a loss of detail, or moving
information that used to be in the main error message into the detail,
then I don't think it's worth it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Shulgin
Date:
Subject: Follow up to irc on CREATE INDEX vs. maintenance_work_mem on 9.3
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2 recovery/startup problems