On 2014-11-21 10:12:40 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Andres Freund (andres@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> > I still think this change makes the error message more verbose, without
> > any win in clarity.
>
> Can we agree that there should be consistency?
Consistency with what? Are you thinking of the messages in
aclck.c:no_priv_msg? I don't think that's really comparable. A
permission denied on a relation is much easier to understand than
replication permissions and such.
It'd surely not be better if pg_basebackup would a error message bar
actually helpful information. Btw, the replication permission use in
postinit.c isn't related to slots.
> I'm not really particular about which way we go with the specific
> wording (suggestions welcome..) but the inconsistency should be dealt
> with.
Meh.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
