Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobsDtMVPbaus3=WtSsTz=qFnzsvhjDacf46u60em8y4Zg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> [Action required within 72 hours.  This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item.  Robert,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> 9.6 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
> message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1.  Consequently, I will appreciate your
> efforts toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.

Discussion of this issue is still ongoing.  Accordingly, I intend to
wait until that discussion has concluded before proceeding further.
I'll check this thread again no later than Friday and send an update
by then.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Typo in pg_visibility