On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
>>
>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Robert,
>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
>> 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
>> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
>> message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
>> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
>> well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your
>> efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
>
> Discussion of this issue is still ongoing. Accordingly, I intend to
> wait until that discussion has concluded before proceeding further.
> I'll check this thread again no later than Friday and send an update
> by then.
Although I have done a bit of review of this patch, it needs more
thought than I have so far had time to give it. I will update again
by Tuesday.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
