Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobrQPt_=uL9dzns3J8V8Rs97rNw8MCx37bC8R-7=63=Lw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 2:01 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Well if we can get Andres' suggestion to work all this might go away,
> which would keep everyone happy, especially me. You're right that I was
> a little careless upthread. Mea culpa. Meanwhile I am committing a
> minimal one line fix.

I in no way intended to accuse you of being careless. I was just
pointing out that this stuff seems to be hard to get right, even for
smart people.

I really hate committing stuff that turns out to be broken. It's such
a fire drill when the build farm turns red.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATEROLE and role ownership hierarchies
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)