Re: pg_upgrade improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_upgrade improvements
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobpUDUz3n7j01N97uoLukAsSqdJ-gajX2TAXZ5angquSA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade improvements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade improvements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
>> The single-user option *sounds* viable, but, iirc, it actually isn't due
>> to the limitations on what can be done in that mode.
>
> Yeah.  IMO the right long-term fix is to be able to run pg_dump and psql
> talking to a standalone backend, but nobody's gotten round to making
> that possible.

Are you thinking about something like postgres --single
--port=PORT_NUMBER_OR_SOCKET_DIRECTORY?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: improve SLRU replacement algorithm
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade improvements