Re: [HACKERS] WAL Consistency checking for hash indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WAL Consistency checking for hash indexes
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobjsN_O-zOPjsg=b+q1WAYRJq+SOiqAkmj5ur0LxnhzvQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WAL Consistency checking for hash indexes  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] WAL Consistency checking for hash indexes
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Kuntal Ghosh
> <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I've attached a patch which implements WAL consistency checking for
>> hash indexes. This feature is going to be useful for developing and
>> testing of WAL logging for hash index.
>>
>
> I think it is better if you base your patch on (Microvacuum support
> for hash index - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/13/835/).

I'd rather have this based on top of the WAL logging patch, and have
any subsequent patches that tinker with the WAL logging include the
necessary consistency checking changes also.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cost model for parallel CREATE INDEX
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0