Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobi92_5_fepjhPC+wHVfXGY5_Ckz7PCdwrKg0bjz3+h_w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 6/24/15 3:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Meh. The relevant branches already exist, as you can disable it today.
>>
>> We could also just change the default in the back branches.
>
> One more argument for leaving everything alone.  If users don't like it,
> they can turn it off themselves.

I find it very hard to disagree with that perspective.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?