Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?
Date
Msg-id 558B07E2.3020704@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/24/15 3:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Meh. The relevant branches already exist, as you can disable it today.
> 
> We could also just change the default in the back branches.

One more argument for leaving everything alone.  If users don't like it,
they can turn it off themselves.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Trustly PostgreSQL Data Corruption Bug Bounty Program
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?