Re: [BUGS] BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobhzmbvxghvDUvS_7-7+EYjLeXuH1_8kjyMBQxsLB1pRA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values  (Adrian Vondendriesch <adrian.vondendriesch@credativ.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Adrian Vondendriesch
<adrian.vondendriesch@credativ.de> wrote:
> Am 06.11.2015 um 17:06 schrieb Robert Haas:
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Adrian.Vondendriesch
>> <Adrian.Vondendriesch@credativ.de> wrote:
>>> New patch attached and rebased on HEAD
>>> (8c75ad436f75fc629b61f601ba884c8f9313c9af).
>>
>> I've committed this with some modifications:
>>
>> - I changed the comment for the half_rounded() macros because the one
>> you had just restated the code.
>> - I tightened up the coding in numeric_half_rounded() very slightly.
>> - You didn't, as far as I can see, modify the regression test schedule
>> to execute the files you added.  I consolidated them into one file,
>> added it to the schedule, and tightened up the SQL a bit.
>
> Looks much better now.
>
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, and please let me know if I muffed anything.
>
> Thanks for reviewing and improving the changes.
>
> I changed the status to committed.

Great, thank you for working on this.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
Next
From: Nathan Wagner
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for geqo tweaks