Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobcZ8YHeY=L-Z6pRpane7iMZXZERjQuiSQ_wAZiamgFjA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> I think it's because there are some things we want to include in the
>> core distribution without baking them irrevocably into the server.
>
> I have mentioned before isn't really what this discussion is about. Stephen
> Frost and I even went through the entire list of modules of what should and
> should not be included.
>
>> Which, IMV, is 100% reasonable.
>
> Nobody is arguing with that.

Well then I am confused.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1