Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob__iMRQR+z09M-qSK8PvuUtuCxx25Ucjs-9jSW=zZtng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Patch attached.

ISTM that we have broad consensus that doing this at initdb time is
more desirable than doing it in the server on the fly.  Not everyone
agrees with that (you don't, for instance) but there were many, many
votes in favor of that option.

Judging by the commit I just pushed to do initdb-time selection of the
dynamic shared memory implementation to use, this is probably not hard
to code.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: CommitFest progress
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem