Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobXUtSYNKpZmMGUf_4WnUYJU+utn1MHcr32aVNCPr7mRQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2016-02-11 09:51:26 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I have never been quite clear on what you think is going to cause
>> stdbool.h inclusions to become more common.
>
> Primarily because it's finally starting to be supported across the
> board, thanks to MS finally catching up.
>
> Then there's uglyness like:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/508bd3a0-b0a1-4f10-ad9c-2f86656f6e79%40postgrespro.ru

So, is it being pulled in indirectly by some other #include?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: pl/pgsql exported functions
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions