Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
Date
Msg-id 20160211145413.7pgme6ae74mqqnvs@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-02-11 09:51:26 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I have never been quite clear on what you think is going to cause
> stdbool.h inclusions to become more common.

Primarily because it's finally starting to be supported across the
board, thanks to MS finally catching up.

Then there's uglyness like:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/508bd3a0-b0a1-4f10-ad9c-2f86656f6e79%40postgrespro.ru



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension