Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobRNn90-ahJL=sHkxRf5nw8+wVrqL0f4sCFfuBXhE4SWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM, David Rowley
> <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 7 March 2017 at 15:21, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1.  How about changing the description of
>>> max_parallel_workers_per_gather to "taken from max_worker_processes,
>>> limited by max_parallel_workers"?
>>
>> Thanks for looking.
>>
>> Seems more accurate to say that it's "taken from
>> max_parallel_workers", maybe.
>>
>
> I thought of saying similar to what we have in docs, however the way
> you have written works for me.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Allow interrupts on waiting standby