Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobKwsArYvABa0LAOXOeoXgf+=ROCrhUihEmQT+X=3ioww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> - pg_basebackup -R generates recovery.conf.auto.

Does anything cause that file to get read?

Wouldn't it be better to just append to postgresql.conf.auto?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?