Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobKwBi5qTO_v4Smy0GbN0kFv_pXXX4OqiAJ4s4qpZLQjw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> Being cautious pays more in the long term, so seeing the number of
>> bugs that showed up I'd rather vote for having it disabled by default
>> in 9.6 stable, and enabled on master to aim at enabling it in 10.0.
>
> I too prefer to keep it turned off in 9.6 and consider enabling it by
> default on a future release (10 is probably good).  Interested users can
> carefully test the feature without endangering other unsuspecting users.
>
> I agree with the idea of keeping it enabled in master, so that it'll get
> a modicum of testing there by hackers, too.

Sounds like that is the consensus.  Who's going to implement it?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLocks in DSM memory
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Onlys Scan for expressions