Re: global / super barriers (for checksums) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: global / super barriers (for checksums)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobH=Ku42_0889zjd75PbTfgp2HL=3VuAMinOV9tTNAgZQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: global / super barriers (for checksums)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: global / super barriers (for checksums)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:54 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I'd either add a test (if we have some) or placeholder kind
> initially. But I'd also be ok with going for either of the other
> versions directly - but it seems harder to tackle the patches together.

OK. I have committed 0001-0003 as I had mentioned last week that I
intended to do. For 0004, I have replaced "sample" with "placeholder"
and added comments explaining that this is intended to be replaced by
the first real user of the mechanism. If there are no further
comments/objections I'll go ahead with this one as well.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mahendra Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line
Next
From: Mahendra Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum