Re: global / super barriers (for checksums) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: global / super barriers (for checksums)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoapuJLy+rkx-6HzNnmP-iML9NU9g06=Bvx26uU2UXcK2g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: global / super barriers (for checksums)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: global / super barriers (for checksums)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 1:38 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:54 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > I'd either add a test (if we have some) or placeholder kind
> > initially. But I'd also be ok with going for either of the other
> > versions directly - but it seems harder to tackle the patches together.
>
> OK. I have committed 0001-0003 as I had mentioned last week that I
> intended to do. For 0004, I have replaced "sample" with "placeholder"
> and added comments explaining that this is intended to be replaced by
> the first real user of the mechanism. If there are no further
> comments/objections I'll go ahead with this one as well.

And, done.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeremy Schneider
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Global Index
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Building infrastructure for B-Tree deduplication that recognizeswhen opclass equality is also equivalence