Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob=SmL3Np7BqHUwHrkgtk-Sj6+RHRfek7LTrVcKU0bYrw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> That isn't the case. We have evidence that the current knobs are
> hugely ineffective in some cases.
>
> Turning the bgwriter off is hardly "adjusting a setting", its
> admitting that there is no useful setting.
>
> I've suggested changes that aren't possible by tuning the current knobs.

OK, fair point.  But I don't think any of us - Greg included - have an
enormously clear idea why turning the background writer off is
improving performance in some cases.  I think we need to understand
that better before we start changing things.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: hubert depesz lubaczewski
Date:
Subject: Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks