Re: constants for tar header offsets - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: constants for tar header offsets
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob3wRzUhZbWDQ-6kgs84S+A7CJVsBWcD7+q+mKd3taZ3Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: constants for tar header offsets  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: constants for tar header offsets  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 12:06 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Hmm, you're right: I checked the POSIX.1-2018 spec as well, and
> it agrees that the prefix field is 155 bytes long.  Perhaps just
> add another comment line indicating that 12 bytes remain unassigned?

OK. Here's v2, with that change and a few others.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session