On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:20 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> The existing IN() syntax somehow manages to produce a useful bigint[]
> SAOP when I use the same mix of integer types/constants that were used
> for my original test case from yesterday:
Interesting. I would not have guessed that. I wonder how it works.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com