Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob14thvsiPg_PahJZu6gsH_66PMvqJ5FYLoiOL98-CTLQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > Looks like there's some problem with commandline parsing?
>
> That test script is expecting glibc-like laxness of switch
> parsing.  Put the switches before the non-switch arguments.

I just did that. :-)

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization