Re: tar-related code in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: tar-related code in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaxG17TzEX0VTpY3Uaps3YGoegyCgv8U02-Fp-T5dY1AQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: tar-related code in PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: tar-related code in PostgreSQL  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Bleah.  Whether or not the nearest copy of tar happens to spit up on
> that, it's a clear violation of the POSIX standard for tar files.
> I'd vote for back-patching your 0001.

Done.

> I'd lean mildly to holding 0002 until after we branch.  It probably
> won't break anything, but it probably won't fix anything either.

True.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Fixes for two separate bugs in nbtree VACUUM's page deletion
Next
From: Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel GiST build on Cube