On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Might it be a good idea to put it on it's own row instead of changing
>> the format of an existing row, in order not to break scripts and
>> programs that are parsing the previous output?
>
> Good idea! What row name should we use for the WAL file containing
> REDO record? "Latest checkpoint's REDO file"?
Sounds good to me. I like the idea, too. The status quo is an
unnecessary nuisance, so this will be a nice usability improvement.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
