On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> I'm a bit late to the party, but wouldn't
>>>
>>> recovery_target_action = ...
>>>
>>> have been a better name for this? It'd be in line with the other
>>> recovery_target_* parameters, and also a bit shorter than the imho
>>> somewhat ugly "action_at_recovery_target".
>>
>> FWIW, I too think that "recovery_target_action" is a better name.
>
> I agree.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
