On 02/12/14 18:59, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm a bit late to the party, but wouldn't
>>>>
>>>> recovery_target_action = ...
>>>>
>>>> have been a better name for this? It'd be in line with the other
>>>> recovery_target_* parameters, and also a bit shorter than the imho
>>>> somewhat ugly "action_at_recovery_target".
>>>
>>> FWIW, I too think that "recovery_target_action" is a better name.
>>
>> I agree.
>
> +1.
>
Here is patch which renames action_at_recovery_target to
recovery_target_action everywhere.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services