Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoadsNdX5aPDCG2NOh5FBOFTTt5mW0opgDE7Bzx8AbEmow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Robert Haas escribió:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
>> > Any comments on this?
>>
>> I'm not sure I'd want to back-patch this, since it is a behavior
>> change, but I do think it's probably a good idea to change it for 9.3.
>
> Hm, but the bug is said to happen only in 9.2, so if we don't backpatch
> we would leave 9.2 alone exhibiting this behavior.

Oh, yeah.  I missed that.  But then shouldn't we start by identifying
which commit broke it before we decide on a fix?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Very minor feature suggestion
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123