On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 4:05 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is a first attempt. I'm not tremendously happy with it, but it at
> least gets something on the page to build on. I was originally going to
> copy/paste the relevant steps into the description of the incremental
> process, but that seemed kind-of silly, so I instead just pointed to the
> relevant steps of the "full" process, along with the deviations from those
> steps. That's a little more work for the reader, but maybe it isn't too
> bad... I plan to iterate on this patch some more.
What jumps out at me when I read this patch is that it says that an
incremental run should do steps 1-3 of a complete run, and then
immediately backtracks and says not to do step 2, which seems a little
strange.
I played around with this a bit and came up with the attached, which
takes a slightly different approach. Feel free to use, ignore, etc.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
