Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaaF=ok6HJ3edYdC4R4j-PYdEkJfdJevt24jEDJa+WQvQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> What do other people think? Should RETURNING project updated tuples as
> well as inserted tuples, as described here?

I think it should.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs