On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I guess the question is whether this is a stop-ship item for spgist.
>> If it is, then we're going to have to spend the time to fix this, but
>> if not, then since it was submitted more than two weeks after the
>> start of the CommitFest, it seems we should postpone it to 9.3.
>
> If we buy into the assumption that nulls support can/should be bolted on
> after the fact, then postponing it to 9.3 would be reasonable. I wasn't
> very happy with that idea though, and would like to look at this issue
> before 9.2 gets frozen. So please don't pull it from the CF yet.
OK.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
