Re: Use of literal in SGML docs - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Use of literal in SGML docs
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaTsnfrjjprOnyWVGKiw983T0E80m1YhUcuQzqOaYgMgA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Use of literal in SGML docs  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> Did we want to do any more on the issue of using <literal> for numbers
> in our docs?  The February thread is here:
>
>        http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2011-02/msg00028.php
>
> While the applied patch removed the 'literal' tag from some numbers, we
> were not consistenly using 'literal' for constants in our docs.
>
> I can make the change if we decide what we consistently want, or maybe it
> is fine as-is.

I think it's fine as-is.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd
Next
From: Ray Stell
Date:
Subject: Re: create foreign table