On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Well, alternatively, can we get a consensus for doing that? People
> did speak against removing PL source code from \df+ altogether, but
> maybe they're willing to reconsider if the alternative is doing nothing.
>
> Personally I'm on the edge of washing my hands of the whole thing...
The hand-washing strategy has a lot to recommend it; this thread is
going nowhere fast. I don't care enough to put up a big stink about
the idea of removing PL source code from \df+ output, but it's not
what I'd choose to do; let's call me -0 on that option.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
