Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaCg6SX8YEnkwQAwDaqk0SSk9x2_EFWRFCLEafFqXroKA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 4:09 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> The most common issues we get are around this issue of virtualized paths
> in the TAP tests. If people followed the rule I suggested upthread, 99%
> of those problems would go away.

Well, that makes it sound like it's the fault of people for not
following the rules, but I don't think that's really a fair
assessment. Even your first guess as to how to solve this particular
problem wasn't correct, and if you can't guess right on the first try,
I don't know how anyone else is supposed to do it. I still don't even
understand why your first guess wasn't right. I feel like every time I
try to add a TAP test Msys blows up, and I can't figure out how to fix
it myself. Which is not a great feeling.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication