Re: Corruption during WAL replay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa=1a+A_gK4gqBf7ypK9NyY5bo--Wqc7Wp3xm8fjsrUOQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Corruption during WAL replay  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Corruption during WAL replay
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> That'll just reduce the probability of failure, not eliminate it.

I mean, if the expected time to the first failure on even 1 machine
exceeds the time until the heat death of the universe by 10 orders of
magnitude, it's probably good enough.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: identifying unrecognized node type errors
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Corruption during WAL replay