Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA"
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa8r+CK_uKHVjC9ZGwdowZwAd19oX0b+SctqM-U9NywNQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA"  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA"  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
> I would MUCH rather that we find a way to special-case executing
> non-transactional commands dynamically, because VACUUM isn't the only one
> that suffers from this problem.

Is pg_background a solution to this problem?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}