Re: Removing binaries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Removing binaries
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa5ug=K+qv=vKtpAWd+_HL+cnYfHAsJM4rdPGa3hTE04w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Removing binaries  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Removing binaries  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 3/21/17 08:12, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think a big part of the usability problem here comes from the fact
>> that the default database for connections is based on the username,
>> but the default databases that get created have fixed names (postgres,
>> template1).  So the default configuration is one where you can't
>> connect.  Why the heck do we do it that way?
>
> Historical, probably.  We could ponder changing the way the default
> database is determined, but I don't want to imagine the breakage coming
> out of that.

What do you think would break?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Fwd: free space map and visibility map
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash