Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZwFEkFZg3zH39=8e1f2QhKQTzUK8KfFHWcwv5DOTWTFw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Kohei Kaigai <Kohei.Kaigai@EMEA.NEC.COM> writes:
>>> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
>>> Well, they should get at least a warning from referencing undefined
>>> functions, no?
>
>> Yes. User should notice warning messages due to undefined symbols.
>> I'm not certain whether it makes sense to add -Werror here, or not.
>
> Hmm.  That would help catch the problem, but I'm a bit uncomfortable
> with adding -Werror in relatively new code.  On the other hand, it's
> not like we expect sepgsql to work on a wide variety of systems, so
> maybe it'd be OK.
>
> On the whole I don't think it's worth messing with the cflags for this.

Yeah, I agree.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache