Re: Autonomous Transaction is back - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Autonomous Transaction is back
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZvfQU_OgdT7JmYfOyEVnQCjSHGmxVZ_jOk1pxA3pz-CA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autonomous Transaction is back  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> Requesting for everyone's opinion regarding this based on which we can
>> proceed to enhance/tune/re-write our design.
>
> So, one of the things which came up during the discussion was advancing
> XMIN, which is not important to the audit logging use case, but is very
> important for the batch job use case.  What have you concluded regarding
> this item?

Could you explain more specifically what you are talking about here?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Eliminating CREATE INDEX comparator TID tie-breaker overhead