Re: Autonomous Transaction is back - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Autonomous Transaction is back
Date
Msg-id 55B13382.1000205@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Autonomous Transaction is back  (Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com>)
Responses Re: Autonomous Transaction is back
List pgsql-hackers
> Requesting for everyone's opinion regarding this based on which we can
> proceed to enhance/tune/re-write our design.   

So, one of the things which came up during the discussion was advancing
XMIN, which is not important to the audit logging use case, but is very
important for the batch job use case.  What have you concluded regarding
this item?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Eliminating CREATE INDEX comparator TID tie-breaker overhead
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?