On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
>
>> My thinking behind this was that the patch is a bug fix and intended
>> to be back-patched, so I wanted to mess with as little infrastructure
>> as possible. A new version of libpq seems like a very big ask for
>> such a case. You'll recall that the original problem was that
>>
>> \c service=foo
>>
>> only worked accidentally for some pretty narrow use cases and broke
>> without much of a clue for the rest. It turned out that the general
>> problem was that options given to psql on the command line were not
>> even remotely equivalent to \c, even though they were documented to
>> be.
>
> So, in view of these arguments and those put forward by Pavel
> downthread, I think the attached is an acceptable patch for the master
> branch. It doesn't apply to back branches though; 9.4 and 9.3 have a
> conflict in tab-complete.c, 9.2 has additional conflicts in command.c,
> and 9.1 and 9.0 are problematic all over because they don't have
> src/common. Could you please submit patches adapted for each group of
> branches?
I'm fine with this change in master, but I vote against back-patching
it. This is not such an important problem that we need to take the
risk of destabilizing existing installations.
(Also, src/common is only 2 years old, so how would we back-patch
anything touching that past 9.3 anyway?)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
