Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZt1MDhP1Bd5j5TXVdzxJVOPqAKO6g=PFP0HMBQOjBaow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications  (Joshua Brindle <joshua.brindle@crunchydata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 6:03 PM Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
> Patch for discussion attached.

So... you're just going to replace ALL error messages of any kind with
"ERROR: missing error text" when this option is enabled?  That sounds
unusable.  I mean if I'm reading it right this would get not only
messages from SQL-callable functions but also things like "deadlock
detected" and "could not read block %u in file %s" and "database is
not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss in database with
OID %u".  You can't even shut it off conveniently, because the way
you've designed it it has to be PGC_POSTMASTER to avoid TOCTTOU
vulnerabilities.  Maybe I'm misreading the patch?

I don't think it would be crazy to have a mode where we try to redact
the particular error messages that might leak information, but I think
we'd need to make it only those.  A wild idea might be to let
proleakproof take on three values: yes, no, and maybe.  When 'maybe'
functions are involved, we tell them whether or not the current query
involves any security barriers, and if so they self-censor.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Kuzmenkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Drop type "smgr"?