Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZriceWqD4WD2vzEgPPcbAoY6OPR0N9fQJ2ZPVdH_AzYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 10:48 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Hmm ... I agree with you that the end result could be nicer code,
> but what's making it nicer is a pretty substantial amount of human
> effort for each and every call site.  Is anybody stepping forward
> to put in that amount of work?
>
> My proposal is to leave the call sites alone until someone feels
> like doing that sort of detail work.

My plan was to nerd-snipe Thomas Munro into doing it.[1]

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

[1] https://xkcd.com/356/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Expr. extended stats are skipped with equality operator