Re: increasing the default WAL segment size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZrT7ky=ASZwxQMf3ovWhP6=_wVBD2AELERqtvBvwxrzg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: increasing the default WAL segment size  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: increasing the default WAL segment size  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> ... but I think this is just folly.  You'd have to do major amounts
> of work to keep, eg, slave servers on the same page as the master
> about what the segment size is.

I said an initdb-time parameter, meaning not capable of being changed
within the lifetime of the cluster.  So I don't see how the slave
servers would get out of sync?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size