Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZodUpRLYF2fOjaQS7KZFQRWvaYpxzUKcLG1HRP2_1Wig@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch  ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>>> superuser privileges; it's the selective-dump case where you can often
>>>> get by without them.  I've attached a proposed patch along these lines
>>>> for your consideration.
>>> That's fair.
>> Should I go ahead and apply that portion, then?
> I am certainly not opposed.

OK, done.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v6.5
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: regclass error reports improperly downcased