Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZkakb+fLqW9UhJLqaq2KrkKzHO5YB6nMJXGzJArcjAJQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 7/23/13 9:06 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> But just BTW, you kind of messed up that CommitFest entry.  The link you
>> added as a new version of the
>> patch was actually to a different patch from the same flock.
>
> Fixed now, since I find myself looking back through history on submissions
> often enough to care about it being right.  My eyes were starting to glaze
> over by the end of staring at this "flock".

Cool.

I'm pretty sure that's the correct collective noun for patches.  Right?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: improve Chinese locale performance
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Design proposal: fsync absorb linear slider